at the discussions taking place around our country regarding the
new direction we must take ourselves if we are to stop our de-
pendance on oil from other countries. _Green Earl
Please click on the title above for information and training
in the Green Career Field. "This is the best, most cost-effective
online energy training anywhere in the world." After you are
trained in residential and commercial audits, you can work any-
where in your own business. Contact me then, and I'll show you
how you can earn up to $500K your first year in conservation and
solar, like I did in 1981 when I formed American Energy Conservation
Group...Still Producing Negawatts....Since 1981. Green Earl, Founder
From: "J R Chamberlain \(Yahoo\)"
"Renewable Energy Advocates for Obama"
To: David
Is not "solar to steam" not the same thing as Solar thermal? If not, what
is it?
John
-----Original Message-----
From: David Fillingham [mailto:dfillingham@earthlink.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 4:24 PM
To: Renewable Energy Advocates for Obama
Subject: [RenewableEnergyAdvocatesforObama] Re[4]: Re:
Valentine,
I have heard that the cost is $1BB per project for nuclear energy.
I do not promote solar to steam, but thermal and tidal, if they are
well designed, can be thoroughly useable.
Yes photo-voltaic will be more efficient and cheaper. But right now is
the time to start. 20 years is a good current lifetime, and we use
24-7 monitors to catch problems in real time, which are infrequent.
Not a golden bullet, but a silver one perhaps. And getting better.
--
Sincerely,
David Fillingham
Liberty Bell Advisors
Sustainable Energy Partners LLC
79 Marlboro Street
Belmont, MA 02478
Cell: 617 230-1904
dfillingham@earthlink.net
Chief Analyst and Advisor,
Institutional Real Estate Division
www.separtners.com
The Highest Compliment I Can Receive is a Referral From a Client
You wrote 4/26/2009:
> Globally, we're spending +/- $1 billion on nuclear fusion research a year.
> The cash value of USA's annual energy output = +/- $150 billion
> What many believe we need to spend, globally, annually on fusion research
=
> $20 Billion
> About the about we gave as pocket money to our auto-industries last
> December.
> And your using return on investment as an argument?
> Thermal engines, or solar-to-steam are only about 10-20% efficient, would
> probably require a major faction of the surface of the Earth to meet our
> needs on there own.
> Photo-electric, although more efficient, in there silicon incarnation, are
> pretty difficult to make, have a lot of undesirable waste products in
there
> manufacture, and are costly to service. With good 60-70% carbon nano-tube
> photo-electric materials being 10-20 years away from mass-manufacturing,
> solar power isn't exactly the golden bullet everyone believes it to be...
> Just right yet.
> So, can we have a serious discussion on Energy now?
> Thanks
> Valentine Obasuyi
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "David Fillingham"
> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 11:41 PM
> To: "Valentine Obasuyi"
> Subject: Re[2]: [RenewableEnergyAdvocatesforObama] Re:
>> Valentine,
>>
>> The metaphor is simple. You want to ring a doorbell. So, shoot a
>> cannon at the ringer. No wait, the cannonball will go through the
>> house. So you have to make a very thick metal barrier with a hole in
>> it just big enough to allow the ball through and to touch the ringer.
>> All at a cost of $1BB and up. What is the return on that investment?
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>> David Fillingham
>> Liberty Bell Advisors
>> Sustainable Energy Partners LLC
>> 79 Marlboro Street
>> Belmont, MA 02478
>> Cell: 617 230-1904
>> dfillingham@earthlink.net
>>
>> Chief Analyst and Advisor,
>> Institutional Real Estate Division
>> www.separtners.com
>>
>> The Highest Compliment I Can Receive is a Referral From a Client
>>
>> You wrote 4/26/2009:
>>> Steam?
>>> I think your still talking about fission.
>>
>>
>>> Please use just ten minutes of your time to understand what I am talking
>>> about.
>>
>>> Watch this clip. (skip to about 4 minutes if your really short on time)
>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut-nf3ym1bI
>>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "David Fillingham"
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 11:17 PM
>>> To: "Valentine Obasuyi"
>>> Cc: "Renewable Energy Advocates for Obama"
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [RenewableEnergyAdvocatesforObama] Re:
>>
>>>> Valentine,
>>>>
>>>> Very good start to a real discussion. I am also big on solar and
>>>> thermal power, wind can be small or large so they are all over the
>>>> map, so to speak, in return on manufacturing and materials.
>>>>
>>>> It is a little like Ivan Illich who suggested that the best mode of
>>>> transportation is bicycles because it is requires much less energy
>>>> than running. This ignores the cost of manufacturing and materials.
>>>>
>>>> If we got some large tracts of land, and a electric company on the
>>>> grid that would cooperate, we could generate a large amount of
>>>> electricity in the daytime with solar farms.
>>>>
>>>> I have talked about nuclear, and I will reiterate if needed. I think
>>>> it is a miserable way to create steam for extremely expensive
>>>> operations.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> David Fillingham
>>>> Sustainable Energy Partners LLC
>>>> dfillingham@earthlink.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You wrote 4/26/2009:
>>>>> Well since I'm getting bombarded with these emails on a daily basis, I
>>>>> might
>>>>> as well have a go at setting the agenda.
>>>>
>>>>> I'm a strong believer in solar power, not so much in wind (in +50%
>>>>> cases,
>>>>> a
>>>>> wind turbine requires more energy in manufacture, than it would ever
>>>>> produce
>>>>> in it's serviceable lifetime), however, one thing I never hear you
talk
>>>>> about is Nuclear, and no, I'm not just talking about Fission.
>>>>
>>>>> In the short and long term, I believe that solar power, (thermal
>>>>> engine,
>>>>> photo-electric or otherwise) will provide a fair chunk of our energy.
>>>>> However, if you have ever tried to worked out the nations energy
>>>>> demands,
>>>>> both current, and projected, there is no way in hell that they could
be
>>>>> met
>>>>> by renewables alone.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> If a good hour, please watch
>>>>>
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=28DB72A86FBA8744&search_query=horizo
n+fusion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Also, another episode from Horizon on a similar topic
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9NO84uvrg8
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eS8Uep0z4o
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It's quite frustrating that we're not even on the right discussion.
>>>>> Your
>>>>> still arguing over polar bears as if they are the only thing we have
to
>>>>> worry about.
>>>>
>>>>> Imagine, if this was the Obama's Apollo project, imagine if your
>>>>> children
>>>>> lived in the "Energy Age"
>>>>
>>>>> It's time to start the debate.
>>>>
>>>>> Valentine Obasuyi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This email was sent to 350 members of Renewable Energy Advocates for
>>>>> Obama
>>>>> Listserv email address:
>>>>> RenewableEnergyAdvocatesforObama@groups.barackobama.com
>>>>> Your reply will be sent to: val@theskyunion.com
>>>>> Unsubscribe or change your email settings:
>>>>>
http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/RenewableEnergyAdvocatesforObama/listse
rv-unsub
>>>>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to 350 members of Renewable Energy Advocates for Obama
Listserv email address:
RenewableEnergyAdvocatesforObama@groups.barackobama.com
Your reply will be sent to: dfillingham@earthlink.net
Unsubscribe or change your email settings:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/RenewableEnergyAdvocatesforObama/listse
rv-unsub
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment